Advertisement
Editorial| Volume 36, ISSUE 2, P167-168, March 2023

Understanding the continuum of care in critical care: Not ABC but EBCD

  • Amy Freeman-Sanderson
    Affiliations
    Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia
    Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
    Critical Care Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Newtown, NSW 2042, Australia
    Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre (ANZIC-RC), School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, St Kilda Rd, VIC 3004, Australia
    Search for articles by this author
      The continuum of care is a term used to describe the collective phases of patients' illnesses. In critical care, it is recognised that phases such as pre–intensive care unit (ICU), during-ICU, and post-ICU do not occur in isolation but are inheritably linked and influence a patient's recovery journey.
      • Vincent J.-L.
      The continuum of critical care.
      Understanding evidence-based care needs has moved beyond focussed healthcare delivery within the walls of the ICU and has rapidly progressed to exploring and evaluating care needs before and post ICU admission.
      • Higgins A.M.
      • Neto A.S.
      • Bailey M.
      • Barrett J.
      • Bellomo R.
      • Cooper D.J.
      • et al.
      Predictors of death and new disability after critical illness: a multicentre prospective cohort study.
      • Haines K.J.
      • Hibbert E.
      • Leggett N.
      • Boehm L.M.
      • Hall T.
      • Bakhru R.N.
      • et al.
      Transitions of care after critical illness—challenges to recovery and adaptive problem solving∗.
      • Currey J.
      • Allen J.
      • Jones D.
      Critical care clinician perceptions of factors leading to Medical Emergency Team review.
      Researching along the critical care continuum has enabled a more focussed understanding of the impact of critical care illness on survivors and their families, considering functions such as being able to communicate or mobilise, and more broadly speaking, considering participation in society through activities as return to work.
      • Hodgson C.L.
      • Udy A.A.
      • Bailey M.
      • Barrett J.
      • Bellomo R.
      • Bucknall T.
      • et al.
      The impact of disability in survivors of critical illness.
      From a resource and healthcare workforce planning model, evidence from across the entire continuum of care is imperative. It enables understanding and drives advocacy for adequate staffing across nursing, medical, and allied health for the delivery of timely and adequate care considering diverse health needs. How do we understand what patients need and want? Increased use of experience-based co-design research methodologies (EBCD), which include understanding the state of evidence; observing processes of care; collection of patient, family, and staff voices; and joint collaborative design of care pathways, is one such solution.
      • Clarke D.
      • Jones F.
      • Harris R.
      • Robert G.
      What outcomes are associated with developing and implementing co-produced interventions in acute healthcare settings? A rapid evidence synthesis.
      These inclusive and well-considered research methodologies are pivotal to understanding and designing solutions that consider all members of the critical care team—nursing, medical, allied health, and patients/families with lived experience.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Australian Critical Care
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Vincent J.-L.
        The continuum of critical care.
        Crit Care. 2019; 23: 122
        • Higgins A.M.
        • Neto A.S.
        • Bailey M.
        • Barrett J.
        • Bellomo R.
        • Cooper D.J.
        • et al.
        Predictors of death and new disability after critical illness: a multicentre prospective cohort study.
        Intensive Care Med. 2021; 47: 772-781
        • Haines K.J.
        • Hibbert E.
        • Leggett N.
        • Boehm L.M.
        • Hall T.
        • Bakhru R.N.
        • et al.
        Transitions of care after critical illness—challenges to recovery and adaptive problem solving∗.
        Crit Care Med. 2021; 49
        • Currey J.
        • Allen J.
        • Jones D.
        Critical care clinician perceptions of factors leading to Medical Emergency Team review.
        Aust Crit Care. 2018; 31: 87-92
        • Hodgson C.L.
        • Udy A.A.
        • Bailey M.
        • Barrett J.
        • Bellomo R.
        • Bucknall T.
        • et al.
        The impact of disability in survivors of critical illness.
        Intensive Care Med. 2017; 43: 992-1001
        • Clarke D.
        • Jones F.
        • Harris R.
        • Robert G.
        What outcomes are associated with developing and implementing co-produced interventions in acute healthcare settings? A rapid evidence synthesis.
        BMJ Open. 2017; 7e014650
        • Foley C.
        • Bloomer M.
        • Hutchinson A.M.
        Factors that influence intensive care admission decisions for older people: a systematic review.
        Aust Crit Care. 2023; 36: 274-284
        • Australian Bureau of Statistics
        Population aged over 85 to double in the next 25 years. [Internet].
        Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2018 ([cited 2023 Jan 23]. Available from)
        • McCarthy P.D.
        • Street M.
        • Sprogis S.K.
        • Considine J.
        The patient experience of a medical emergency team review: a convergent mixed-methods study.
        Aust Crit Care. 2023; 36: 254-261
        • Clayton N.A.
        • Walker E.
        • Freeman-Sanderson A.
        Clinical profile and recovery pattern of dysphagia in the COVID-19 patient: a prospective observational cohort within NSW.
        Aust Crit Care. 2023; 36: 262-268
        • Nyhagen R.
        • Egerod I.
        • Rustøen T.
        • Lerdal A.
        • Kirkevold M.
        Unidentified communication challenges in the intensive care unit: a qualitative study using multiple triangulations.
        Aust Crit Care. 2023; 36: 215-222
        • Su H.
        • Thompson H.J.
        • Pike K.
        • Kamdar B.B.
        • Bridges E.
        • Hosey M.M.
        • et al.
        Interrelationships among workload, illness severity, and function on return to work following acute respiratory distress syndrome.
        Aust Crit Care. 2023; 36: 247-253
        • Rose L.
        • Istanboulian L.
        • Amaral A.C.K.-B.
        • Burry L.
        • Cox C.E.
        • Cuthbertson B.H.
        • et al.
        Co-designed and consensus based development of a quality improvement checklist of patient and family-centered actionable processes of care for adults with persistent critical illness.
        J Crit Care. 2022; 72
        • Haines K.J.
        • Holdsworth C.
        • Cranwell K.
        • Skinner E.H.
        • Holton S.
        • MacLeod-Smith B.
        • et al.
        Development of a peer support model using experience-based Co-design to improve critical care recovery.
        Crit Care Explor. 2019; 1e0006