Advertisement

Tracheostomy clinical practices and patient outcomes in three tertiary metropolitan hospitals in Australia

Published:April 27, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2022.03.002

      Abstract

      Background

      There is a paucity of literature in Australia on patient-focused tracheostomy outcomes and process outcomes. Exploration of processes of care enables teams to identify and address existing barriers that may prevent earlier therapeutic interventions that could improve patient outcomes following critical care survival.

      Objectives

      The objectives of this study were to examine and provide baseline data and associations between tracheostomy clinical practices and patient outcomes across three large metropolitan hospitals.

      Methods

      We performed a retrospective multisite observational study in three tertiary metropolitan Australian health services who are members of the Global Tracheostomy Collaborative. Deidentified data were entered into the Global Tracheostomy Collaborative database from Jan 2016 to Dec 2019. Descriptive statistics were used for the reported outcomes of length of stay, mortality, tracheostomy-related adverse events and complications, tracheostomy insertion, airway, mechanical ventilation, communication, swallowing, nutrition, length of cannulation, and decannulation. Pearson’s correlation coefficient and one-way analyses of variance were performed to examine associations between variables.

      Results

      The total cohort was 380 patients. The in-hospital mortality of the study cohort was 13%. Overall median hospital length of stay was 46 days (interquartile range: 31-74). Length of cannulation was shorter in patients who did not experience any tracheostomy-related adverse events (p= 0.036) and who utilised nonverbal communication methods (p = 0.041). Few patients (8%) utilised verbal communication methods while mechanically ventilated, compared with 80% who utilised a one-way speaking valve while off the ventilator. Oral intake was commenced in 20% of patients prior to decannulation. Patient nutritional intake varied prior to and at the time of decannulation. Decannulation occurred in 83% of patients.

      Conclusions

      This study provides baseline data for tracheostomy outcomes across three large metropolitan Australian hospitals. Most outcomes were comparable with previous international and local studies. Future research is warranted to explore the impact of earlier nonverbal communication and interventions targeting the reduction in tracheostomy-related adverse events.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Australian Critical Care
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Casamento A.
        • Bailey M.
        • Robbins R.
        • Pilcher D.
        • Warrillow S.
        • Ghosh A.
        • et al.
        Patient characteristics, incidence, technique, outcomes and early prediction of tracheostomy in the state of Victoria, Australia.
        Crit Care. 2018; 44: 278-284
        • Wilkinson K.
        • IC M.
        • H F.
        • Kk M.M.
        NCEPOD: on the right trach?.
        2014
        • McGrath B.
        • Wallace S.
        • Lynch J.
        • Bonvento B.
        • Coe B.
        • Owen A.
        • et al.
        Improving tracheostomy care in the United Kingdom: results of a guided quality improvement programme in 20 diverse hospitals.
        Br J Anaesth. 2020; 125: e119-e129
        • Cameron T.S.
        • McKinstry A.
        • Burt S.K.
        • Howard M.E.
        • Bellomo R.
        • Brown D.J.
        • et al.
        Outcomes of patients with spinal cord injury before and after introduction of an interdisciplinary tracheostomy team.
        Critical Care & Resuscitation. 2009; 11: 14-19
        • Speed L.
        • Harding K.,E.
        Tracheostomy teams reduce total tracheostomy time and increase speaking valve use: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Crit Care. 2013; 28 (e1-.e10): 216
        • Mestral C.
        • Iqbal S.
        • Fong N.
        • LeBlanc J.
        • Fata P.
        • Razek T.
        • et al.
        Impact of a specialized multidisciplinary tracheostomy team on tracheostomy care in critically ill patients.
        Can J Surg. 2011; 54: 167-172
        • Tobin A.
        • Santamaria J.
        An intensivist-led tracheostomy review team is associated with shorter decannulation time and length of stay: a prospective cohort study.
        Crit Care. 2008; 12
        • Pandian V.
        • Miller C.
        • Mirsk M.
        • Schiavi A.
        • Morad A.
        • Vaswani R.
        • et al.
        Multidisciplinary team approach in the management of tracheostomy patients.
        Otolaryngology-Head Neck Surg (Tokyo). 2012; 147
        • Mah J.
        • Staff I.
        • Fisher S.
        • Buterl K.
        Improving decannulation and swallowing function: a comprehensive multidisciplinary approach to post-tracheostomy care.
        Respir Care. 2017; 62: 137-143
        • Brenner M.
        • Pandian V.
        • Milliren C.
        • Graham D.
        • Zaga C.
        • Morris L.
        • et al.
        Global Tracheostomy Collaborative: data-driven improvements in patient safety through multidisciplinary teamwork, standardisation, education, and patient patnership.
        Br J Anaesth. 2020; 125: E104-E118
        • Enamandram S.
        • Peltz A.
        • Arora A.
        • Narula A.
        • Roberson D.
        • Hettige R.
        Global Tracheostomy Collaborative: the future of quality improvement strategies.
        Current Otorhinolaryngology Reports. 2014; 2: 13-19
        • Happ M.
        Communicating with mechanically ventilated patients: state of the science.
        AACN Clinical Issues. 2001; 12: 247-258
        • Guttormson J.L.
        • Bremer K.L.
        • Jones R.M.
        "Not being able to talk was horrid": a descriptive, correlational study of communication during mechanical ventilation.
        Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2015; 31: 179-186
        • Freeman-Sanderson A.L.
        • Togher L.
        • Elkins M.R.
        • Phipps P.R.
        Return of voice for ventilated tracheostomy patients in ICU: a randomized controlled trial of early-targeted intervention.
        Crit Care Med. 2016; 44: 1075-1081
        • Freeman-Sanderson A.L.
        • Togher L.
        • Elkins M.R.
        • Phipps P.R.
        Quality of life improves with return of voice in tracheostomy patients in intensive care: an observational study.
        J Crit Care. 2016; 33: 186-191
        • Pandian V.
        • Cole T.
        • Kilonsky D.
        • Holden K.
        • Feller-Kopman D.
        • Brower R.
        • et al.
        Voice-related quality of life increases with a talking tracheostomy tube: a randomised controlled trial.
        Larynogscope. 2020; 130: 1249-1255
        • Zaga C.
        • Berney S.
        • Vogel A.P.
        The feasibility, utility, and safety of communication interventions with mechanically ventilated Intensive Care Unit patients: a systematic review.
        Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019; 28: 1335-1365
        • Bose S.
        • Hoenig B.
        • Karamourtopoulos M.
        • Banner-Goodspeed V.
        • Brown S.
        Beyond survival: identifying what matters to survivors of critical illness.
        Crit Care. 2021; 25
        • von Elm E.
        • Altman D.
        • Egger M.
        • Pocock S.
        • Gotzsche P.
        • Vanderbroucke J.
        The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2008; 61: 344-349
        • Corp I.
        IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 26.0.
        IBM Corp, Armonk, NY2019
        • Shah R.,K.
        • Lander L.
        • Berry J.
        • Nussenbaum B.
        • Merati A.
        • Roberson D.
        Tracheotomy outcomes and complications: a national perspective.
        Laryngoscope. 2012; 122: 25-29
        • Mcgrath B.
        • Thomas A.
        Patient safety incidents associated with tracheostomies occurring in hospital wards: a review of reports to the UK National Patient Safety Agency.
        Postgrad Med. 2010; 86: 522-525
        • Halum S.
        • Ting J.
        • Plowman E.
        • Belafsky P.
        • Harbarger C.
        • Postma G.
        • et al.
        A multi-institutional analysis of tracheotomy complications.
        Laryngoscope. 2011; 122: 38-45
        • Milch C.
        • Salem D.
        • Pauker S.
        • Lundquist T.
        • Kumar S.
        • Chen J.
        Voluntary electronic reporting of medical errors and adverse events: an analysis of 92,547 reports from 26 acute care hospitals.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2005; 21: 165-170
        • Sparato E.
        • Durakovic N.
        • Kallogjeri D.
        • Nussenbaum B.
        Complications and 30-day hospital readmission rates of pateints undergoing tracheostomy: a prospective analysis.
        Laryngoscope. 2017; 127: 2746-2753
        • Zaga C.
        • Sweeney J.
        • Cameron T.
        • Campbell M.
        • Warrillow S.
        • Howard M.
        Factors associated with short versus prolonged tracheostomy length of cannulation and the relationship between length of cannulation and adverse events.
        Australian Critical Care, 2021
        • Southcott A.
        • Holdsworth C.
        • Malcolm L.
        • Muruganandan S.
        • Skinner E.
        Evaluation of the implementation of a Tracheostomy Review Service (TRS): an observational cohort study.
        Interprofessional Care. 2019; 33: 697-705
        • Leung R.
        • Campbell D.
        • McGregor L.
        • Berkowitz R.
        Decannulation and survival following tracheostomy in an intensive care unit.
        Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2003; 112: 853-858
        • Freeman-Sanderson A.
        • Morris K.
        • Elkins M.
        Characteristics of patient communicaiton and prevalence of communication difficulty in the intensive care unit: an observational study.
        Aust Crit Care. 2019; 32: 373-377
        • Rose L.
        • Istanboulian L.
        • Smith O.M.
        • Silencieux S.
        • Cuthbertson B.H.
        • Amaral A.C.K.B.
        • et al.
        Feasibility of the electrolarynx for enabling communication in the chronically critically ill: the EECCHO study.
        J Crit Care. 2018; 47: 109-113
        • El-Soussi A.
        • Elshafey M.
        • Othman S.
        • Abd-Elkader F.
        Augmented alternative communication methods in intubated COPD patients: does it make a difference.
        Egypt J Chest Dis Tuberc. 2015; 64: 21-28
        • Hosseini S.R.
        • Valizad-Hasanloei M.A.
        • Feizi A.
        The effect of using communication boards on ease of communication and anxiety in mechanically ventilated conscious patients admitted to intensive care units.
        Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2018; 23: 358-362
        • Garry J.
        • Casey K.
        • Cole T.K.
        • Regensburg A.
        • McElroy C.
        • Schneider E.
        • et al.
        A pilot study of eye-tracking devices in intensive care.
        Surgery. 2016; 159: 938-944
        • Maringelli F.
        • Brienza N.
        • Scorrano F.
        • Grasso F.
        • Gregoretti C.
        Gaze-controlled, computer-assisted communication in Intensive Care Unit: "speaking through the eyes".
        Minerva Anestesiol. 2013; 79: 165-175
        • Carruthers H.
        • Astin F.
        • Munro W.
        Which alternative communication methods are effective for voiceless patients in Intensive Care Units? A systematic review.
        Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2017; 42: 88-96
        • Sutt A.
        • Cornwell P.
        • Mullany D.
        • Kinneally T.
        • Fraser J.F.
        The use of tracheostomy speaking valves in mechanically ventilated patients results in improved communication and does not prolong ventilation time in cardiothoracic intensive care unit patients.
        J Crit Care. 2015; 30: 491-494
        • Sutt A.
        • Tronstad O.
        • Barnett A.
        • Kitchenman S.
        • Fraser J.
        Earlier tracheostomy is associated with an earlier return to walking, talking, and eating.
        Aust Crit Care. 2020; 33: 213-218
        • Ceron C.
        • Otto D.
        • Signorini A.
        • Beck M.
        • Camilis M.
        • Sganzerla D.
        • et al.
        The effect of speaking valves on ICU monbility of individuals with tracheostomy.
        Respir Care. 2020; 65: 144-149
        • Sutt A.
        • Hay K.
        • Kinneally T.
        • Fisquet S.
        • Fraser J.
        Sedatives, analgesics and antipsychotics in tracheostomised ICU pateints - is less more?.
        Aust Crit Care. 2020; 33: 407-411
        • Sutt A.L.
        • Anstey C.M.
        • Caruana L.R.
        • Cornwell P.L.
        • Fraser J.F.
        Ventilation distribution and lung recruitment with speaking valve use in tracheostomised patient weaning from mechanical ventilation in intensive care.
        J Crit Care. 2017; 40: 164-170
        • Australia S.P.
        Tracheostomy practice guideline.
        2021
        • McGowan S.L.
        • Ward E.C.
        • Wall L.R.
        • Shellshear L.R.
        • Spurgin A.L.
        UK survey of clinical consistency in tracheostomy management.
        Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2014; 49: 127-138
        • Pryor L.
        • Ward E.
        • Cornwell P.
        • O'Connor S.
        • Chapman M.
        Clinical inidicators associated with successful tracheostomy cuff deflation.
        Aust Crit Care. 2016; 29: 132-137
        • Dettelbach M.
        • Gross R.
        • Mahmann J.
        • Eibling D.
        Effect of the Passy-Muir valve on aspiration in patients with tracheostomy.
        Head Neck. 1995; 17: 297-302
        • Stachler R.
        • Hamlet S.
        • Choi J.
        • Fleming S.
        Scintigraphic quantification of aspiration reduction with the Passy-Muir valve.
        Laryngoscope. 1996; 106: 231-234
        • Suiter D.
        • Leder S.
        Contribution of tracheostomy tubes and one-way speaking valves to swallowing success.
        Top Geriatr Rehabil. 2007; 23: 3410351
        • Elpern E.
        • Okonek M.
        • Bacon M.
        • Gerstung C.
        • Skrzynski M.
        Effect of the Passy-Muir tracheostomy speaking valve on pulmonary aspiration in adults.
        Heart Lung. 2000; 29: 287-293
        • Pryor L.
        • Ward E.
        • Cornwell P.
        • O'Connor S.
        • Chapman M.
        Patterns of return to oral intake and decannulation post-trachesotomy across clinical populations in an acute inpatient settings.
        Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2016; 51: 556-567
        • Freeman-Sanderson A.
        • Togher L.
        • Phipps P.
        • Elkins M.
        A clinical audit of the management of patients with a tracheostomy in an Australian tertiary hospital intensive care unit: focus on speech-language pathology.
        Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011; 13: 518-525
        • Hafner G.
        • Neuhuber A.
        • Hirtenfelder S.
        • Schmedler B.
        • Eckel H.
        Fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in intensive care unit patients.
        Eur Arch Otolaryngology. 2008; 265: 441-446
        • Hales P.A.
        • Drinnan M.J.
        • Wilson J.A.
        The added value of fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in tracheostomy weaning.
        Clin Otolaryngol. 2008; 33: 319-324
        • Warnecke T.
        • Suntrup S.
        • Teismann I.K.
        • Hamacher C.
        • Oelenberg S.
        • Dziewas R.
        Standardized endoscopic swallowing evaluation for tracheostomy decannulation in critically ill neurologic patients.
        Crit Care Med. 2013; 41: 1728-1732
        • Hernandez Martinez G.
        • Rodriguez M.
        • Vaquero M.
        • Ortiz R.
        • Masclans J.
        • Roca O.
        • et al.
        High-flow oxygen with capping or suctioning for tracheostomy decannulation.
        NEJM. 2020; 383: 1009-1017
        • Singh R.
        • Saran S.
        • Baronia A.
        The practice of tracheostomy decannulation - a systematic review.
        Intensive Care. 2017; 5: 1-12
        • Stelfox H.
        • Crimi C.
        • Berra L.
        • Noto A.
        • Schmidt U.
        • Bigatello L.
        • et al.
        Determinants of tracheostomy decannulation: an international survey.
        Crit Care. 2008; 12
        • McGrath B.
        • Wallace S.
        • Wilson M.
        • Nicholson L.
        • Felton T.
        • Bowyer C.
        • et al.
        Safety and feasibility of above cuff vocalisation for ventilator-dependent patients with tracheostomies.
        Journal of Intensive Care Society. 2019; 20
        • Mills C.S.
        • Michou E.
        • King N.
        • Bellamy M.C.
        • Siddle H.J.
        • Brennan C.
        • et al.
        Evidence for above cuff vocalization in patients with a tracheostomy: a systematic review.
        Laryngoscope. 2022; 132: 600-611https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.29591