Advertisement

Living with uncertainty in clinical research

      Three decades ago, the CNSA Journal, which today is Australian Critical Care, began as a periodical to inform specialist nurses, particularly those working in critical care areas, about clinical practice. Over the years, submissions to the journal have changed considerably. Initially, many of the articles published were opinion pieces, reflections on personal experiences and professional communications. However, in the past decade, there has been an increased shift towards publication of original research or reviews of original research. And, the quantity of original research published has increased, so too has the complexity of the science and expectations of quality. Herein lies a challenge for authors, editors, and peer reviewers. – Where is it appropriate and acceptable to draw the line when making decisions about what to publish?
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Australian Critical Care
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Wasserstein R.L.
        • Schirm A.L.
        • Lazar N.A.
        Moving to a world beyond “p < 0.05”.
        Am Statistician. 2019; 73: 1-19https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2019.1583913
        • Bhatt D.L.
        • Mehta C.
        Adaptive designs for clinical trials.
        NEJM. 2016; 375: 65-74
        • Bauer H.H.
        Scientific literacy and the myth of the scientific method.
        University of Illinois Press, Chicago1992
        • Polit D.F.
        • Beck C.T.
        Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice.
        Wolters Kluwer|Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia2012
      1. Bergman M.M. Advances in mixed methods research. Sage, Los Angeles2008