Advertisement

The differing perspectives of doctors and nurses in end-of-life decisions in the intensive care unit: A qualitative study

Published:October 31, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2019.08.004

      Abstract

      Background

      End-of-life (EOL) decision-making in the intensive care unit (ICU) can be emotionally challenging for both doctors and nurses, who are sometimes placed in difficult positions where they are required to make decisions on behalf of patients. With an ageing population and advances in medical technology, there is an increase in such decisions being made in ICUs.

      Objectives

      The objective of this study was to explore the perspectives of doctors and nurses involved in the EOL decision-making process in an ICU.

      Methods

      This study used a qualitative methodology based on naturalistic inquiry. Intensive care nurses and doctors from a large Sydney metropolitan public hospital were purposively selected, and data saturation was reached after a total of eight nurses and four doctors were interviewed. Data were collected through semistructured interviews, either face-to-face or over the telephone. Interviews were then transcribed verbatim, and themes were identified and coded through a line-by-line analysis of each transcript (manual thematic analysis).

      Findings

      The findings revealed two main themes: ‘Doctors' and nurses' roles in decision-making’ and ‘Managing family expectations’. These themes highlighted key differences in decision-making processes, in that doctors tended to aim to meet the family's needs, while the nurses tended to advocate on behalf of the patient and what they interpreted as the patient's best interests. Furthermore, nurses tended to feel undervalued in decision-making during family conferences, when in reality, the doctors were making decisions based on all information obtained, primarily from nursing staff.

      Conclusions

      EOL decision-making is complex and affects doctors and nurses involved in different ways. More emphasis on interprofessional education and collaboration between the two disciplines may enhance future decision-making processes.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Australian Critical Care
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Westphal D.
        • McKee S.
        End-of-life decision making in the intensive care unit: physician and nurse perspectives.
        Am J Med Qual. 2009; 24: 222-229
        • Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society
        ANZICS Statement on care and decision-making at the end of life for the critically ill. Australia.
        2014 (Contract No.: 2434)
        • Lind R.
        • Lorem G.F.
        • Nortvedt P.
        • Hevroy O.
        Intensive care nurses' involvement in the end-of-life process - perspectives of relatives.
        Nursing Ethics. 2012; 19: 666-676
        • Jensen H.I.
        • Ammentorp J.
        • Johannessen H.
        • Ørding H.
        Challenges in end-of-life decisions in the intensive care unit: an ethical perspective.
        J Bioeth Inq. 2013; 10: 93-101https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-012-9416-5
        • Baggs J.
        • Schmitt M.H.
        • Prendergast T.J.
        • Norton S.A.
        • Sellers C.R.
        • Quinn J.R.
        • et al.
        Who is attending? End-of-life decision making in the intensive care unit.
        J Palliat Med. 2012; 15: 56-62
        • Lind R.
        • Lorem G.F.
        • Nortvedt P.
        • Hevroy O.
        Family members' experiences of “wait and see” as a communication strategy in end-of-life decisions.
        Intensive Care Med. 2011; 37: 1143-1150
        • McMillen R.
        End-of-life decisions: nurses perceptions, feelings and experiences.
        Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2008; 24: 251-259
        • Bloomer M.
        • Lee S.
        • O'Connor M.
        End-of-life communication in ICU: a retrospective observational study - implications for nursing.
        Aust J Adv Nurs. 2011; 28: 17-23
        • Latour J.
        • Fulbrook P.
        • Albarran J.W.
        EfCCNA survey: European intensive care nurses' attitudes and beliefs towards end-of-life care.
        Nurs Crit Care. 2009; 14: 110-121
        • Gutierrez K.M.
        Experiences and needs of families regarding prognostic communication in an intensive care unit: supporting families at the end of life.
        Crit Care Nurs Q. 2012; 35: 299-313
        • Trankle S.A.
        Is a good death possible in Australian critical and acute settings?: physician experiences with end-of-life care.
        BMC Palliat Care. 2014; 13: 1-14
        • Erlandson D.A.
        • Harris E.L.
        • Skipper B.L.
        • Allen S.D.
        Doing naturalistic inquiry: a guide to methods.
        Sage publications, California, United States of America1993
        • Tong A.
        • Sainsbury P.
        • Craig J.
        Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.
        Int J Qual Health Care. 2007; 19: 349-357
        • Frank A.W.
        Practicing dialogical narrative analysis.
        in: Holstein J.A. Gubrium J.F. Varieties of narrative analysis. Sage, 2012 (Online)
        • Streubert H.J.
        • Carpenter D.R.
        Qualitative research in nursing: advancing the humanistic imperative.
        5th ed. Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, United States of America2011
        • Chaboyer W.P.
        • Patterson E.
        Australian hospital generalist and critical care nurses' perceptions of doctor-nurse collaboration.
        Nurs Health Sci. 2001; 3: 73-79
        • Papathanassoglou E.D.E.
        • Karanikola M.N.K.
        • Kalafati M.
        • Giannakopoulou M.
        • Lemonidou C.
        • Albarran J.W.
        Professional autonomy, collaboration with physicians, and moral distress among European Intensive Care Nurses.
        Am J Crit Care. 2012; 21: 41-52
        • Australian College of Critical Care Nurses
        Practice standards for specialist critical care nurses.
        3rd ed. Australian College of Critical Care Nurses, Melbourne, Victoria2015
      1. Australian College of critical care nurses. Position statement on critical care nurse education. Australian College of Critical Care Nurses, Melbourne, Victoria2017
        • Fassier T.
        • Azoulay E.
        Conflicts and communication gaps in the intensive care unit.
        Curr Opin Crit Care. 2010; 16: 654-665
        • Rose L.
        • Bloomberg L.S.
        Interprofessional collaboration in the ICU: how to define?.
        British Assoc Crit Care Nurses. 2011; 16: 5-10