Advertisement

Barriers to implementing expert safety recommendations for early mobilisation in intensive care unit during mechanical ventilation: A prospective observational study

      Abstract

      Background

      Early mobilisation in the intensive care unit (ICU) has been consistently reported as feasible and safe with minimal adverse events; however, invasive mechanical ventilation patients are rarely actively mobilised. An expert consensus group developed and published recommendations using a traffic light system on safety criteria to promote active mobilisation of invasive mechanical ventilation patients.

      Objectives

      The aim of this study was to determine whether, in clinical practice, the safety consensus recommendations resulted in (1) increased early mobilisation in patients assessed as appropriate to mobilise based on the risk classification and (2) early mobilisation without adverse events.

      Methods

      A prospective observational study of 100 patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) for greater than 24 h admitted to the ICU at The Alfred Hospital. Patients were assessed daily (Monday to Friday) to determine their ability to perform early mobilisation.

      Results

      Data were collected on 100 patients, resulting in 280 physiotherapy–patient interactions during IMV. Of the 100 patients, five patients actively mobilised out of bed during IMV. No adverse event occurred during active physiotherapy–patient interactions. There were 15 physiotherapy–patient interactions that had a low risk of an adverse event, and on nine (60.0%) of these physiotherapy–patient interactions, patients were actively mobilised out of bed with the main reported barrier being time constraints. Of 208 physiotherapy–patient interactions where there were significant potential risks of an adverse event identified for mobilising, active out of bed mobilisation did not occur, with sedation being reported as the main barrier in 170 (82%) patients.

      Conclusions

      The translation of expert consensus recommendations for early mobilisation into clinical practice was poor. Clinicians were safe and conservative in the implementation of early mobilisation during IMV.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Australian Critical Care
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Tipping C.J.
        • Harrold M.
        • Holland A.
        • Romero L.
        • Nisbet T.
        • Hodgson C.L.
        The effects of active mobilisation and rehabilitation in ICU on mortality and function: a systematic review.
        Intensive Care Med. 2017; 43: 171-183
        • Fan E.
        • Del Sorbo L.
        • Goligher E.C.
        • Hodgson C.L.
        • Munshi L.
        • Walkey A.J.
        • et al.
        An official American thoracic society/European society of intensive care medicine/society of critical care medicine clinical practice guideline: mechanical ventilation in adult patients with Acute respiratory distress syndrome.
        Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017; 195: 1253-1263
        • Nydahl P.
        • Sricharoenchai T.
        • Chandra S.
        • Sari Kundt F.
        • Huang M.
        • Fischill M.
        • et al.
        Safety of patient mobilization and rehabilitation in the intensive care unit. Systematic review with meta-analysis.
        Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017; 14: 766-777
        • Hodgson C.L.
        • Stiller K.
        • Needham D.M.
        • Tipping C.J.
        • Harrold M.
        • Baldwin C.E.
        • et al.
        Expert consensus and recommendations on safety criteria for active mobilization of mechanically ventilated critically ill adults.
        Crit Care. 2014; 18: 658
        • Groll D.L.
        • To T.
        • Bombardier C.
        • Wright J.G.
        The development of a comorbidity index with physical function as the outcome.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2005; 58: 595-602
        • Knaus W.A.
        • Draper E.A.
        • Wagner D.P.
        • Zimmerman J.E.
        APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system.
        Crit Care Med. 1985; 13: 818-829
        • Sessler C.N.
        • Gosnell M.S.
        • Grap M.J.
        • Brophy G.M.
        • O'Neal P.V.
        • Keane K.A.
        • et al.
        The Richmond agitation-sedation scale: validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients.
        Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002; 166: 1338-1344
        • Ely E.W.
        • Inouye S.K.
        • Bernard G.R.
        • Gordon S.
        • Francis J.
        • May L.
        • et al.
        Delirium in mechanically ventilated patients: validity and reliability of the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU).
        JAMA. 2001; 286: 2703-2710
        • Hodgson C.
        • Needham D.
        • Haines K.
        • Bailey M.J.
        • Ward A.
        • Harrold M.
        • et al.
        Feasibility and inter-rater reliability of the ICU mobility scale.
        Heart Lung. 2014; 43: 19-24
        • Tipping C.J.
        • Bailey M.J.
        • Bellomo R.
        • Berney S.
        • Buhr H.
        • Denehy L.
        • et al.
        The ICU mobility scale has construct and predictive validity and is responsive: a multicenter observational study.
        Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016; 13: 887-893
        • Parry S.M.
        • Knight L.D.
        • Connolly B.
        • Baldwin C.
        • Puthucheary Z.
        • Morris P.
        • et al.
        Factors influencing physical activity and rehabilitation in survivors of critical illness: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.
        Intensive Care Med. 2017; 43: 531-542
        • Team Study Investigators
        Early mobilization and recovery in mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU: a bi-national, multi-centre, prospective cohort study.
        Crit Care. 2015; 19: 81
        • Leditschke I.A.
        • Green M.
        • Irvine J.
        • Bissett B.
        • Mitchell I.A.
        What are the barriers to mobilizing intensive care patients?.
        Cardiopulm Phys Ther J. 2012; 23: 26-29
        • Berney S.C.
        • Harrold M.
        • Webb S.A.
        • Seppelt I.M.
        • Patman S.
        • Thomas P.
        • et al.
        Intensive care unit mobility practices in Australia and New Zealand: a point prevalence study.
        Crit Care Resusc. 2013; 15: 260-265
        • Nydahl P.
        • Ruhl A.P.
        • Bartoszek G.
        • Dubb R.
        • Filipovic S.
        • Flohr H.J.
        • et al.
        Early mobilization of mechanically ventilated patients: a 1-day point-prevalence study in Germany.
        Crit Care Med. 2014; 42: 1178-1186
        • Jolley S.E.
        • Moss M.
        • Needham D.M.
        • Caldwell E.
        • Morris P.E.
        • Miller R.R.
        • et al.
        Point prevalence study of mobilization practices for acute respiratory failure patients in the United States.
        Crit Care Med. 2017; 45: 205-215
        • Sibilla A.
        • Nydahl P.
        • Greco N.
        • Mungo G.
        • Ott N.
        • Unger I.
        • et al.
        Mobilization of mechanically ventilated patients in Switzerland.
        J Intensive Care Med. 2017; (885066617728486)
        • Anekwe D.E.
        • Koo K.K.
        • de Marchie M.
        • Goldberg P.
        • Jayaraman D.
        • Spahija J.
        Interprofessional survey of perceived barriers and facilitators to early mobilization of critically ill patients in Montreal, Canada.
        J Intensive Care Med. 2017; (885066617696846)
        • Costa D.K.
        • White M.R.
        • Ginier E.
        • Manojlovich M.
        • Govindan S.
        • Iwashyna T.J.
        • et al.
        Identifying barriers to delivering the awakening and breathing coordination, delirium, and early exercise/mobility bundle to minimize adverse outcomes for mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review.
        Chest. 2017; 152: 304-311
        • Barber E.A.
        • Everard T.
        • Holland A.E.
        • Tipping C.
        • Bradley S.J.
        • Hodgson C.L.
        Barriers and facilitators to early mobilisation in Intensive Care: a qualitative study.
        Aust Crit Care. 2015; 28: 177-182
        • Hodgson C.L.
        • Bailey M.
        • Bellomo R.
        • Berney S.
        • Buhr H.
        • Denehy L.
        • et al.
        A binational multicenter pilot feasibility randomized controlled trial of early goal-directed mobilization in the ICU.
        Crit Care Med. 2016; 44: 1145-1152
        • Schaller S.J.
        • Anstey M.
        • Blobner M.
        • Edrich T.
        • Grabitz S.D.
        • Gradwohl-Matis I.
        • et al.
        Early, goal-directed mobilisation in the surgical intensive care unit: a randomised controlled trial.
        Lancet. 2016; 388: 1377-1388