Advertisement

Handover from operating theatre to the intensive care unit: A quality improvement study

Published:April 26, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2018.03.009

      Abstract

      Background

      Transitioning a patient from the operating theatre (OT) to the intensive care unit (ICU) is a dynamic and complex process. Handover of the critically ill postoperative patient can contribute to procedural and communication errors. Standardised protocols are means for structuring and improving handover content. Both have been shown to be effective in reducing information omission and improve communication during this transition period.

      Objectives

      The aim of this uncontrolled before and after study was to improve handover processes and communication about the care for critically ill patients transferred from OT to ICU.

      Methods

      Thirty-two OT to ICU handovers (16 before and 16 after implementation) were observed. Using a structured tool, we documented who was present, participated in, and initiated handover during ICU admission. Where and when handover was performed, information provided, distractions and interruptions, and handover duration were also recorded. Unstructured field notes and diagrams provided information on staff interaction. Following implementation, semistructured interviews with 27 participants were conducted to understand participants' perceptions of intervention acceptability and to determine factors influencing intervention implementation and spread.

      Findings

      Following implementation, a “hands-off” approach was observed with fewer technical tasks completed during handover (43.8% before implementation vs 12.5% after implementation) without an increase in handover time. A single, multidisciplinary handover most often led by the anaesthetist was observed after implementation. Despite these improvements, the use of the physical checklist was not observed in practice, and an situation, background, assessment, recommendation (SBAR) format was not followed. Anaesthetists leading the handover did not view the handover checklist as being beneficial to their practice although some nurses were observed to use the checklist as a prompt for additional information.

      Conclusions

      A single, multidisciplinary handover demonstrated improvement in handover practice despite low uptake of the protocol checklist. Further information is required to inform targeted strategies to improve uptake and sustainability although broader interdisciplinary engagement and commitment may be helpful.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Australian Critical Care
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC)
        National health and quality health service standards.
        ACSQHC, Sydney2011
        • Popovich D.
        Cultivating safety in handoff communication.
        Ped Nurse. 2011; 37: 55-60
        • The Joint Commission
        Sentinel event data, root causes by event type.
        (2004-June 2013)2013 (Available from:)
        • Singh H.
        • Thomas E.J.
        • Petersen L.A.
        • Studdert D.M.
        Medical errors involving trainees: a study of closed malpractice claims from 5 insurers.
        Arch Int Med. 2007; 167: 2030-2036
        • Smith A.F.
        • Pope C.
        • Goodwin D.
        • Mort M.
        Interprofessional handover and patient safety in anaesthesia: observational study of handovers in the recovery room.
        Br J Anaesth. 2008; 101: 332-337
        • Nagpal K.
        • Abboudi M.
        • Fischler L.
        • Schmidt T.
        • Vats A.
        • Manchanda C.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of postoperative handover using a tool to assess information transfer and teamwork.
        Ann Surg. 2011; 253: 831-837
        • Haig K.M.
        • Sutton S.
        • Whittington J.
        SBAR: a shared mental model for improving communication between clinicians.
        Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006; 32: 167-175
        • Catchpole K.R.
        • De Leval M.R.
        • McEwan A.
        • Pigott N.
        • Elliott M.J.
        • McQuillan A.
        • et al.
        Patient handover from surgery to intensive care: using formula 1 pit-stop and aviation models to improve safety and quality.
        Ped Anesth. 2007; 17: 470-478
        • Gardiner T.M.
        • Marshall A.P.
        • Gillespie B.M.
        Clinical handover of the critically ill postoperative patient: an integrative review.
        Aust Crit Care. 2015; 28: 226-234
        • World Health Organization
        Action on patient safety – high 5s.
        2006 (Available from:)
        • Moore G.F.
        • Audrey S.
        • Barker M.
        • Bond L.
        • Bonell C.
        • Hardeman W.
        • et al.
        Process evaluation of complex interventions: medical research council guidance.
        BMJ [Internet]. 2015; 350 (Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h1258)
        • Ogrinc G.
        • Davies L.
        • Goodman D.
        • Batalden P.
        • Davidoff F.
        • Stevens D.
        SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process.
        BMJ Qual Saf. 2016; 25: 986-992
        • Eccles M.
        • Grimshaw J.
        • Campbell M.
        • Ramsay C.
        Research designs for studies evaluating the effectiveness of change and improvement strategies.
        Qual Saf Health Care. 2003; 12: 47-52
        • Elo S.
        • Kyngäs H.
        The qualitative content analysis process.
        J Adv Nurs. 2008; 62: 107-115
        • National Health and Medical Research Council
        National statement on ethical conduct in human research (2007) – Updated May 2015.
        2015
        • World Medical Association
        World Medical Association declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research: Involving human subjects.
        in: 64th WMA General Assembly, Fortaleza, Brazil. 2013
        • Salzwedel C.
        • Bartz H.-J.
        • Salzwedel C.
        • Bartz H.J.
        • Kühnelt I.
        • Appel D.
        • et al.
        The effect of a checklist on the quality of post-anaesthesia patient handover: a randomized controlled trial.
        Int J Qual Health Care. 2013; 25: 176-181
        • Philibert I.
        Use of strategies from high-reliability organisations to the patient hand-off by resident physicians: practical implications.
        Qual Saf Health Care. 2009; 18: 261-266
        • Krmpotic K.R.
        Standardizing the postoperative handover process in the PICU.
        Ped Crit Care Med. 2015; 16: 796
        • Yang J.-G.
        • Zhang J.
        Improving the postoperative handover process in the intensive care unit of a tertiary teaching hospital.
        J Clin Nurs. 2016; 25: 1062-1072
        • Porteous J.M.
        • Stewart-Wynne E.G.
        • Connolly M.
        • Crommelin P.F.
        ISoBAR – a concept and handover checklist: the National Clinical Handover Initiative.
        Med J Aust. 2009; 190: S152-S156
        • Zakrison T.L.
        • Rosenbloom B.
        • McFarlan A.
        • Jovicic A.
        • Soklaridis S.
        • Allen C.
        • et al.
        Lost information during the handover of critically injured trauma patients: a mixed-methods study.
        BMJ Qual Saf [Internet]. 2015; (Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003903)
        • Frankel R.M.
        • Flanagan M.
        • Ebright P.
        • Bergman A.
        • O'Brien C.M.
        • Franks Z.
        • et al.
        Context, culture and (non-verbal) communication affect handover quality.
        BMJ Qual Saf [Internet]. 2012; 21 (Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2012-20001482)
        • Vergales J.
        • Addison N.
        • Vendittelli A.
        • Nicholson E.
        • Carver D.J.
        • Stemland C.
        • et al.
        Face-to-face handoff: improving transfer to the pediatric intensive care unit after cardiac surgery.
        Am J Med Qual. 2015; 30: 119-125
        • Brocklehurst P.R.
        • Williams L.
        • Burton C.
        • Goodwin T.
        • Rycroft-Malone J.
        Implementation and trial evidence: a plea for fore-thought.
        Br Dent J. 2017; 222: 331-335
        • McFetridge B.
        • Gillespie M.
        • Goode D.
        • Melby V.
        An exploration of the handover process of critically ill patients between nursing staff from the emergency department and the intensive care unit.
        Nurs Crit Care. 2007; 12: 261-269
        • Mukhopadhyay A.
        • Leong B.S.H.
        • Lua A.
        • Aroos R.
        • Wong J.J.
        • Koh N.
        • et al.
        Differences in the handover process and perception between nurses and residents in a critical care setting.
        J Clin Nurs. 2015; 24: 778-785
        • Johnston B.
        • Coole C.
        • Narayanasamy M.
        • Feakes R.
        • Whitworth G.
        • Tyrell T.
        • et al.
        Exploring the barriers to and facilitators of implementing research into practice.
        Br J Comm Nurs. 2016; 21: 392-398
        • Hannes K.
        • Vandersmissen J.
        • De Blaeser L.
        • Peeters G.
        • Goedhuys J.
        • Aertgeerts B.
        Barriers to evidence-based nursing: a focus group study.
        J Adv Nurs. 2007; 60: 162-171
        • Drach-Zahavy A.
        • Goldblatt H.
        • Maizel A.
        Between standardisation and resilience: nurses' emergent risk management strategies during handovers.
        J Clin Nurs. 2015; 24: 592-601
        • Breuer R.K.
        • Taicher B.
        • Turner D.A.
        • Cheifetz I.M.
        Standardizing postoperative PICU handovers improves handover metrics and patient outcomes.
        Ped Crit Care Med. 2015; 16: 256-263
        • Craig R.
        • Moxey L.
        • Young D.
        • Spenceley N.S.
        • Davidson M.G.
        Strengthening handover communication in pediatric cardiac intensive care.
        Ped Anesth. 2012; 22: 393-399
        • Petrovic M.A.
        Pilot implementation of a perioperative protocol to guide operating room-to-intensive care unit patient handoffs.
        J Cardiothor Vasc Anesth. 2012; 26: 11-16
        • Gordon M.
        • Findley R.
        Educational interventions to improve handover in health care: a systematic review.
        Med Educ. 2011; 45: 1081-1089