Advertisement

Variability in alignment of central venous pressure transducer to physiologic reference point in the intensive care unit–A descriptive and correlational study

      Abstract

      Background

      The phlebostatic axis is the most commonly used anatomical external reference point for central venous pressure measurements. Deviation in the central venous pressure transducer alignment from the phlebostatic axis causes inadequate pressure readings, which may affect treatment decisions for critically ill patients in intensive care units.

      Aim

      The primary aim of the study was to assess the variability in central venous pressure transducer levelling in the intensive care unit. We also assessed whether patient characteristics impacted on central venous pressure transducer alignment deviation.

      Methods

      A sample of 61 critical care nurses was recruited and asked to place a transducer at the appropriate level for central venous pressure measurement. The measurements were performed in the intensive care unit on critically ill patients in supine and Fowler's positions. The variability among the participants using eyeball levelling and a laser levelling device was calculated in both sessions and adjusted for patient characteristics.

      Results

      A significant variation was found among critical care nurses in the horizontal levelling of the pressure transducer placement when measuring central venous pressure in the intensive care unit. Using a laser levelling device did not reduce the deviation from the phlebostatic axis. Patient characteristics had little impact on the deviation in the measurements.

      Conclusion

      The anatomical external landmark for the phlebostatic axis varied between critical care nurses, as the variation in the central venous pressure transducer placement was not reduced with a laser levelling device. Standardisation of a zero-level for vascular pressures should be considered to reduce the variability in vascular pressure readings in the intensive care unit to improve patient treatment decisions. Further studies are needed to evaluate critical care nurses' knowledge and use of central venous pressure monitoring and whether assistive tools and/or routines can improve the accuracy in vascular pressure measurements in intensive care units.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Australian Critical Care
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Pulmonary artery/central venous pressure monitoring in adults.
        Crit Care Nurse. 2016; 36 (e12-8)
      2. EfCCNa competencies for european critical care nurses. 2013 (Available from:)
        • Magder S.
        How to use central venous pressure measurements.
        Curr Opin Crit Care. 2005; 11: 264-270
        • Guyton A.C.
        • Greganti F.P.
        A physiologic reference point for measuring circulatory pressures in the dog; particularly venous pressure.
        Am J Physiol. 1956; 185: 137-141
        • Winsor T.
        • Burch G.E.
        Phlebostatic Axis and phlebostatic level, reference levels for venous pressure measurements in man.
        Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1945; 58: 165-169
        • Guyton A.C.
        • Hall J.E.
        Vascular distensibility and functions of the arterial and venous systems.
        in: Guyton A.C. Hall J.E. Textbook of medical physiology. 2006: 171-180 (Windsor: Philadelphia, PA)
        • Sondergaard S.
        • Parkin G.
        • Aneman A.
        Central venous pressure: we need to bring clinical use into physiological context.
        Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015; 59: 552-560
        • Tobin M.J.
        Principles and practice of intensive care monitoring.
        McGraw-Hill, 1998 (Health Professions Division)
        • Rauen C.A.
        • Makic M.B.
        • Bridges E.
        Evidence-based practice habits: transforming research into bedside practice.
        Crit Care Nurse. 2009; 29 (quiz 60-61): 46-59
        • Figg K.K.
        • Nemergut E.C.
        Error in central venous pressure measurement.
        Anesth Analg. 2009; 108: 1209-1211
        • Bisnaire D.
        • Robinson L.
        Accuracy of leveling hemodynamic transducer systems.
        Off J Can Assoc Crit Care Nurs. 1999; 10: 16-19
        • Rice W.P.
        • Fernandez E.G.
        • Jarog D.
        • Jensen A.
        A comparison of hydrostatic leveling methods in invasive pressure monitoring.
        Crit Care Nurse. 2000; 20 (20, 22-30)
        • Belela A.S.
        • Pedreira M.L.
        • Peterlini M.A.
        • Kusahara D.M.
        • Carvalho W.B.
        • Gentil G.C.
        Variability in the establishment of an external reference point for central venous pressure measurement in children.
        J Pediatr (Rio J). 2006; 82: 389-394
        • Avellan S.
        • et al.
        Identifying the position of the right atrium to align pressure transducer for CVP: spirit level or 3D electromagnetic positioning?.
        J Clin Monit Comput. 2017; 31: 943-949
        • Gelman S.
        Venous function and central venous pressure: a physiologic story.
        Anesthesiology. 2008; 108: 735-748
        • Marik P.E.
        • Baram M.
        • Vahid B.
        Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares.
        Chest. 2008; 134: 172-178
        • Legrand M.
        • Dupuis C.
        • Simon C.
        • Gayat E.
        • Mateo J.
        • Lukaszewicz A.C.
        • et al.
        Association between systemic hemodynamics and septic acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: a retrospective observational study.
        Crit Care. 2013; 17: R278
        • Wong B.T.
        • et al.
        Mean arterial pressure and mean perfusion pressure deficit in septic acute kidney injury.
        J Crit Care. 2015; 30: 975-981
        • Williams J.B.
        • et al.
        Central venous pressure after coronary artery bypass surgery: does it predict postoperative mortality or renal failure?.
        J Crit Care. 2014; 29: 1006-1010
        • Sirvent J.M.
        • Ferri C.
        • Baró A.
        • Murcia C.
        • Lorencio C.
        Fluid balance in sepsis and septic shock as a determining factor of mortality.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2015; 33: 186-189
        • Chen K.P.
        • Cavender S.
        • Lee J.
        • Feng M.
        • Mark R.G.
        • Celi L.A.
        • et al.
        Peripheral edema, central venous pressure, and risk of AKI in critical illness.
        Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016; 11: 602-608
        • Danziger J.
        • Chen K.
        • Cavender S.
        • Lee J.
        • Feng M.
        • Mark M.G.
        • et al.
        Admission peripheral edema, central venous pressure, and survival in critically ill patients.
        Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016; 13: 705-711
        • Li Z.
        • Sun Y.M.
        • Wu F.X.
        • Yang L.Q.
        • Lu Z.J.
        • Yu W.F.
        Controlled low central venous pressure reduces blood loss and transfusion requirements in hepatectomy.
        World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20: 303-309
        • Liu Y.
        • Cai M.
        • Duan S.
        • Peng X.
        • Lai Y.
        • Li Y.
        Effect of controlled low central venous pressure on renal function in major liver resection.
        Chin Ger J Clin Oncol. 2008; 7: 7-9
        • Sondergaard S.
        • Parkin G.
        • Aneman A.
        Central venous pressure: soon an outcome-associated matter.
        Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2016; 29: 179-185
        • Magder S.
        Central venous pressure: a useful but not so simple measurement.
        Crit Care Med. 2006; 34: 2224-2227
        • Kovacs G.
        • Avian A.
        • Olschewski A.
        • Olschewski H.
        Zero reference level for right heart catheterisation.
        Eur Respir J. 2013; 42: 1586-1594
        • Kovacs G.
        • Avian A.
        • Pienn M.
        • Naeije R.
        • Olschewski H.
        Reading pulmonary vascular pressure tracings. How to handle the problems of zero leveling and respiratory swings.
        Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014; 190: 252-257
        • McCambridge J.
        • Witton J.
        • Elbourne D.R.
        Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: new concepts are needed to study research participation effects.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2014; 67: 267-277