Advertisement

Graduate nurses’ lived experience of in-hospital resuscitation: A hermeneutic phenomenological approach

Published:January 18, 2008DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2007.12.001

      Summary

      Aim

      The purpose of this research was to explore, describe and interpret the lived experience of graduate [junior] Registered Nurses who have participated in an in-hospital resuscitation event within the non-critical care environment.

      Method

      Using a hermeneutic phenomenological design, a convenience sample was recruited from a population of graduate Registered Nurses with less than 12 months experience. Focus groups were employed as a means of data collection. Thematic analysis of the focus group narrative was undertaken using a well-established human science approach.

      Findings

      Responses from participants were analysed and grouped into four main themes: needing to decide, having to act, feeling connected and being supported. The findings illustrate a decision-making process resulting in participants seeking assistance from a medical emergency team based on previous experience, education and the perceived needs of the patient. Following this decision, participants are indecisive, questioning their decision. Participants view themselves as learners of the resuscitation process being educationally prepared to undertake basic life support, but not prepared for roles in a resuscitation event expected of the Registered Nurse, such as scribe. With minimal direction participants identified, implemented and evaluated their own coping strategies. Participants desire an environment that promotes a team approach, fostering involvement in the ongoing management of the patient within a ‘safe zone’.

      Conclusion

      Similarities are identifiable between the graduate nurses’ experience and the experience of bystanders and other healthcare professional cohorts, such as the chaotic resuscitation environment, having too many or not enough participants involved in a resuscitation event, being publicly tested, having a decreased physical and emotional reaction with increased resuscitation exposure and having a lack of an opportunity to participate in debriefing sessions. Strategies should be implemented to provide non-critical care nurses with the confidence and competence to remain involved in the resuscitation process, firstly to provide support for less experienced staff and secondly to participate in the ongoing management of the patient. Additionally, the need for education to be contextualised and mimic the realities of a resuscitation event was emphasised.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Australian Critical Care
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Axelsson A.
        • Herlitz J.
        • Ekstrom L.
        • Holmberg S.
        Bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation out-of-hospital. A first description of the bystanders and their experiences.
        Resuscitation. 1996; 33: 3-11
        • Axelsson A.
        • Herlitz J.
        • Karlsson T.
        • Lindqvist J.
        • Graves J.
        • Ekstrom L.
        • Holmberg S.
        Factors surrounding cardiopulmonary resuscitation influencing bystanders’ psychological reactions.
        Resuscitation. 1998; 37: 13-20
        • Axelsson A.
        • Herlitz J.
        • Fridlund B.
        How bystanders perceive their cardiopulmonary resuscitation intervention: a qualitative study.
        Resuscitation. 2000; 47: 71-81
        • Skora J.
        • Riegel B.
        Thoughts, feelings, and motivations of bystanders who attempt to resuscitate a stranger: a pilot study.
        American Journal of Critical Care. 2001; 10: 408-416
        • Ranse J.
        • Burke B.
        Exploring the volunteer first aiders’ experience post-resuscitation.
        Journal of Emergency Primary Health Care. 2006; 4
        • Morgan R.
        • Westmoreland C.
        Survey of junior hospital doctors’ attitudes to cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
        Postgraduate Medical Journal. 2002; 78: 413-415
        • Cole F.L.
        • Slocumb E.M.
        • Mastey J.M.
        A measure of critical care nurses’ post-code stress.
        Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2001; 34: 281-288
        • Laws T.
        Examining critical care nurses’ critical incident stress after in hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).
        Australian Critical Care. 2001; 14: 76-81
        • Boyde M.
        • Wotton K.
        A review of nurses’ performance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation at cardiac arrests.
        Journal for Nurses in Staff Development. 2001; 17: 248-255
        • Hemming T.R.
        • Hudson M.F.
        • Durham C.
        • Richuso K.
        Effective resuscitation by nurses: perceived barriers and needs.
        Journal for Nurses in Staff Development. 2003; 19: 254-259
        • Page S.
        • Meerabeau L.
        Nurses’ accounts of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
        Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1996; 24: 317-325
        • Ranse J.
        Cardiac arrest: can the in-hospital chain of survival be improved?.
        Australasian Emergency Nursing Journal. 2006; 9: 23-26
        • Bledsoe B.E.
        Critical incident stress management (CISM): benefit or risk for emergency services?.
        Prehospital Emergency Care. 2003; 7: 272-279
        • Smith A.
        • Roberts K.
        Interventions for post-traumatic stress disorder and psychological distress in emergency ambulance personnel: a review of the literature.
        Emergency Medical Journal. 2003; 20: 75-78
        • Ashcraft T.R.
        New nurses, new beginnings.
        Nursing Management. 2004; 35: 22
      1. Commonwealth of Australia. National review of nursing education 2002: our duty of care. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2002.

        • FitzGerald M.
        • Pincombe J.
        • McCutcheon H.
        • Evans D.
        • Wiechula R.
        • Jordan Z.
        An integrative systematic review of nursing curricula: undergraduate clinical education and transitional support for new graduates.
        Queensland Nursing Council, Brisbane, Australia2001
        • McKenna L.G.
        • Green C.
        Experiences and learning during a graduate nurse program: an examination using a focus group approach.
        Nurse Education in Practice. 2004; 4: 258-263
        • Oermann M.H.
        • Garvin M.F.
        Stress and challenges for new graduates in hospital.
        Nurse Education Today. 2002; 22: 225-230
        • Delaney C.
        Walking a fine line: graduate nurses’ transition experiences during orientation.
        Journal of Nursing Education. 2003; 42: 437-444
        • Casey K.
        • Fink R.
        • Krugmann M.
        • Propst J.
        The graduate nurse experience.
        Journal of Nursing Administration. 2004; 34: 303-311
        • Taylor B.
        • Kermode S.
        • Roberts K.
        Research in nursing and health care: evidence for practice.
        3rd ed. Thompson Learning, Southbank, Australia2006
      2. Morse JM Critical issues in qualitative research methods. SAGE Publications, California, United States of America1994
        • van Manen M.
        Researching lived experience: human science for an action sensitive pedagogy.
        The State University of New York, New York1990
        • Lopez K.A.
        • Willis D.G.
        Descriptive versus interpretive phenomenology: their contributions to nursing knowledge.
        Qualitative Health Research. 2004; 14: 726-735
        • Cretikos M.
        • Hillman K.
        The medical emergency team: does it really make a difference?.
        Internal Medicine Journal. 2003; 33: 511-514
        • McLafferty I.
        Focus group interviews as a data collection strategy.
        Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2004; 48: 187-194
        • Webb C.
        • Kevern J.
        Focus groups as a research method: a critique of some aspects and their use in nursing research.
        Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2001; 33: 798-805
        • Gray-Vickery P.
        Gerontological research: use and application of focus groups.
        Journal of Gerontological Nursing. 1993; 19: 21-27
        • Brockopp D.Y.
        • Hastings-Tolsma M.T.
        Fundamentals of nursing research.
        2nd ed. Jones and Barlett Publishers, Boston, United States of America1995
        • Brink P.J.
        • Wood M.J.
        Basic steps in planning nursing research: from question to proposal.
        5th ed. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Massachusetts, United States of America2001
        • Schneider Z.
        • Elliott D.
        • LoBiondo-Wood G.
        • Haber J.
        Nursing research: methods, critical appraisal and utilization.
        2nd ed. Mosby, Marrickville, Sydney, Australia2003