Australian Critical Care
Volume 23, Issue 4 , Pages 197-207, November 2010

Determination of body weight and height measurement for critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit: A quality improvement project

  • Elke Freitag, MN

      Affiliations

    • Intensive Care Unit, Austin Health, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +61 3 9496 4830; fax: +61 3 9496 3932.
  • ,
  • Gay Edgecombe, RN, PhD

      Affiliations

    • RMIT University, Bundoora 3083, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • ,
  • Ian Baldwin, RN, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Intensive Care Unit, Austin Health, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia
  • ,
  • Brendan Cottier, RN

      Affiliations

    • Occupation, Health and Safety, Austin Health, Burgundy Street, Heidelberg, Victoria 3080, Australia
  • ,
  • Melodie Heland, RN, MN

      Affiliations

    • Intensive Care Unit, Austin Health, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia

Received 1 July 2009; received in revised form 16 March 2010; accepted 30 April 2010. published online 25 June 2010.

Summary 

Purpose

Measuring body weight and height of critically ill patients in intensive care often challenge nurses. Estimated weight and height is thought to be inaccurate. This quality improvement project was to determine one effective method of how all patients in intensive care unit (ICU) could be measured and weighed accurately and cost effectively. The determined method also was to be Occupation Health and Safety safe, adhere to infection control standards and minimises risks of patient handling. The focus for this quality improvement was that the measurement methods were to be utilised in conjunction with a baseline patient assessment in the ICU.

Methods

Six different types of weighing scales were compared. Three methods were tested in a workshop for accuracy. The results were compared to a ‘standing scale’ as the ‘gold standard’ for body weight. The second stage of the project was to determine the body height of patients in the supine position. The tools were designed by the quality improvement team (QIT) and manufactured by the hospital Departments. The methods were also tested in a workshop for accuracy. The measurements were compared to a wall mounted stadiometer as the ‘gold standard’.

Results

The two height measurement tools displayed differences of −1.2 to +3cm. The first weighing results of three methods showed variations. The methods displayed differences from 0.8 to 25kg. The aluminium height measurement tools and the Mercury scale conformed to the standard agreed to by the QIT.

Discussion

Staff in the ICU required minimal training for the methods used. The uptake of a measured weight and height, in difference to estimation takes some time for staff to accept and use. Case exemplars that demonstrated an error rate with estimation were useful feedback towards the change in practice.

Conclusion

It was found that critically ill patients could be weighed effectively and accurately with a scale usable for every type of bed available in this ICU. All supine positioned patients can also be measured effectively and accurately with one height measurement method. These methods do not require the patient to be moved. There is no need to disconnect lines or monitoring equipment at any time during the measuring procedures.

Keywords: Critical illness, ICU, Body weight, Height, Scales

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1036-7314(10)00079-2

doi:10.1016/j.aucc.2010.04.003

Australian Critical Care
Volume 23, Issue 4 , Pages 197-207, November 2010