Australian Critical Care
Volume 23, Issue 4 , Pages 177-187, November 2010

Development of clinical practice guidelines for the nursing care of people undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: An Australian & New Zealand collaboration

  • John X. Rolley, RN, BN (Hons), PhD

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Cardiovascular and Chronic Care, Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University, Australia
    • Australian Catholic University, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: School of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Health Sciences, Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University, 39 Regent Street, Chippendale, NSW 2008, Australia. Tel.: +61 2 8382 4024; fax: +61 2 8399 7834.
  • ,
  • Yenna Salamonson, RN, PhD

      Affiliations

    • School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Western Sydney, Australia
  • ,
  • Cheryl R. Dennison, ANP, PhD, FAHA

      Affiliations

    • School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Australia
  • ,
  • Patricia M. Davidson, RN, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Cardiovascular and Chronic Care, Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University, Australia

Received 6 October 2009; received in revised form 30 January 2010; accepted 16 March 2010. published online 23 April 2010.

Summary 

Aim

This paper describes the development of nursing practice guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Background

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) supporting PCI nursing care are limited.

Method

The National Health and Medical Research Council's (NH&MRC) health and medical practice development guidelines were used for the guideline development process. A panel of experts (clinicians and consumers) attended a consensus conference to review existing evidence. Subsequently, nurses’ opinions were identified via an online survey. This was followed by a modified Delphi method was used to refine a draft set of guidelines over two rounds.

Results

The consensus conference was attended by 41 participants (39 cardiovascular nurses and 2 consumer representatives). Eight additional members joined the panel for the modified Delphi rounds with 27 participants completing the online survey. The final guideline document consisted of 75 recommendations. Endorsement was then sought from key peak cardiovascular bodies in Australia and New Zealand.

Discussion/conclusion

Inconclusive evidence precludes definitive recommendations. Therefore, consultation and consensus are important in developing guidelines to achieve standardised nursing care and monitoring of outcomes.

Implications for practice

Nurses play a crucial role in PCI care, yet currently there are limited guidelines to inform practice. This paper describes the method developing clinical practice guideline and deriving consensus.

Keywords: Clinical practice guidelines, Delphi, Consensus methods, Angioplasty (percutaneous coronary), Nursing practice

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1036-7314(10)00040-8

doi:10.1016/j.aucc.2010.03.004

Australian Critical Care
Volume 23, Issue 4 , Pages 177-187, November 2010